Mohammed Naufal v. Debt Recovery Tribunal (Kerala & Lakshwadeep)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 OP (DRT).No. 63 of 2015 (O) ------------------------------------------ I.A.NO.1793 OF 2014 IN D.R.C.NO.562 OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM ------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------ MOHAMMED NAUFAL, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL SALAM, MANAGING PARTNER, TASTY NUTS INDUSTRIES, KILOKOLLOOR, RESIDING AT PATTATHIL HOUSE, AYITHIL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN- 691 017.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.RAJENDRAN SRI.K.R.RANJITH SMT.R.S.SREEVIDYA RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA & LAKSHWADEEP), 5TH FLOOR, KSHB BUILDING, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI- 682 036.

2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA AND LAKSHADWEEP), 5TH FLOOR, KSHB BUILDING, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM KOCHI- 682 036.

BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNADAS P.NAIR, CGC THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

OP (DRT).No. 63 of 2015 (O) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER FOR THE BANK DATED 25.03.2015. EXHIBIT P2:

A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE I.A.NO.1154/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 05.05.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- O.P.(DRT)No. 63 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of May,2015

J U D G M E N T

------------------------- The petitioner approached this Court seeking for a direction to the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) to issue the certified copy of the order dated 28.1.2013 passed in D.R.C.No.562 and connected cases.

2.

The learned CGC points out that the application for certified copies suffers from defects and the petitioner has not cured the defects.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner on verifying the same submits that the application for certified copies have defects and the same will be cured within two days. 4.

In that view of the matter, if proper application is made by the petitioner, certified copy shall be issued to the petitioner within two weeks. In view of the above, for a

O.P.(DRT) No. 63 of 2015 period three weeks, proclamation of sale shall be stayed. The OP (DRT) is disposed of as above.

Sd/ A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE jm/