Mrs. Raziya Fazal v. Authorized Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/9TH ASHADHA, 1937 OP (DRT).No. 85 of 2015 (O) ---------------------------- SA.NO. 189/2015 OF DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM ------------------- PETITIONER/APPLICANT :
--------------------------------------- MRS. RAZIYA FAZAL AGED 43, W/O. ABDUL FAZAL, HOUSE NO. 48/1823 CI MOHABATHEIN HOUSE, KEERTHY NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE (PUTHIYIDAM) RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT :
------------------------------------------- AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, SARC, SBT BHAVAN PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI - 36.
BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn ...2/-
OP (DRT).No. 85 of 2015 (O) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------------- EXT. P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM ON 20.3.15.
EXT. P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 29.4.15 PASSED IN SA NO. 189/2015 OF THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.
EXT. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP DT. 26.5.15 FOR AN AMOUNT OF RS. 2.50 LAKHS.
EXT. P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE TIME ENLARGEMENT APPLICATION DT. 23.6.15 FILED BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
------------------------------------ O.P.(DRT) No.85 of 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner, an applicant before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ernakulam in S.A.No.189/2015, has approached this Court seeking enlargement of the time fixed by the DRT for complying with the conditional order. It appears that, for the same relief the petitioner has approached DRT by Ext.P4.
In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the DRT to consider Ext.P4 submitted by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till a decision is taken by the DRT with regard to enlargement of time, no action shall be initiated against the petitioner for non compliance.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
AV