Subeesh v. Smitha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936 OP (FC).No. 92 of 2015 (R) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.412/2015 IN GOP 202/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 11-03-2015 PETITIONER(S):

--------------------- SUBEESH, S/O.SIVARAMAN AGED 37 YEARS PERINJERY PALLATH HOUSE VARANTHARAPPILLY DESOM, VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.L.BITTO SRI.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------ SMITHA, D/O.DINESH, AGED 34 YEARS THARAYIL HOUSE NO.9, 4TH CROSS, LAKSHMI ROAD SHANTHI NAGAR, BANGALORE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT THARAYIL HOUSE KOORKKANJERY DESOM KOORKKANJERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 001.

THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP (FC).No. 92 of 2015 (R) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

--------------------------------- EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE IA.412/2015 IN OP.202/2014 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 24-2-2015 EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN IA.412/2015 IN OP.202/2014 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 3-3-2015 EXT.P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM VIVEKANANDA VIDHYANIKETHAN SCHOOL, VARANTHARAPPILLY DATED 25-2-2015 EXT.P4 - ORDER PASSED IN IA.412/2015 IN OP.202/2014 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 11-3-2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :

----------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

K.T.SANKARAN & BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JJ.

-------------------------------------- O.P.(F.C.) No.92 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

K.T.Sankaran, J.

Exhibit P4 order dated 11th March, 2015 in I.A.No.412 of 2015 in G.O.P.No.202 of 2014, on the file of the Family Court, Irinjalakuda, is under challenge in this O.P.(F.C.). By the order impugned, the respondent-mother was given interim custody of her daughter for four days from 13.3.2015 to 16.3.2015. The relief prayed for in the Original Petition has become infructuous. Even otherwise, we do not think that an order granting interim custody of the girl child to the mother for a period of four days can ever be challenged by the father of the child.

The O.P.(F.C.) is accordingly dismissed.

K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH JUDGE csl