Harilal v. T.D.Preetha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 OP (FC).No. 337 of 2015 (R) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------

1. HARILAL AGED 31 YEARS S/O SIVSANKARAN NAIR AMBATT VEEDU (SREEKRISHNA VILASAM VALLICODE P.O VALLICODE VILLAGE KOZHENCERRY TALUK PIN-689 648

2. SIVSANKARAN NAIR AMBATT VEEDU (SREEKRISHNA VILASAM VALLICODE P.O VALLICODE VILLAGE KOZHENCERRY TALUK PIN-689 648 BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP M.VARUGHESE RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- T.D.PREETHA D/O DIVAKARAN NAIR, THADISSERIL VEEDU, VELLIYARA P.O AYROOR VILLAGEPIN R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.HARIDAS THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP (FC).No. 337 of 2015 (R) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OFTHE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FAMILY COURT THRUVALLA IN E.P NO.10/2006 IN OP 233/2004 EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN E.A 147/2014 IN EP 10/2006 IN O.P 233/2004 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL ------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

C.K.ABDUL REHIM & MARY JOSEPH, JJ.

========================= OP(FC) No.337 of 2015 ============================ Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

Abdul Rehim, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent orders passed in the execution petition, proclaiming sale of immovable property, the petitioner is not intending to pursue this original petition, since he is taking steps to challenge the subsequent orders passed.

Under the above mentioned circumstances, this original petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order if any, to the extent maintainable under law.

Sd/- C.K .ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE Sd/- MARY JOSEPH, JUDGE vdv