High Court of KeralaOP (FC)/425/2015disposed of

Deepa C v. Sadanandan P

2015-10-05Honourable Mr.Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim,Honourable Mrs. Justice Mary Joseph4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 OP (FC).No. 425 of 2015 () --------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.1522/15 IN O.P.NOS.432/15, 185 & 155/2013 OF THE FAMILY COURT, TIRUR) PETITIONER(S):

--------------

1. DEEPA C AGED 40 YEARS, DEEPA NIVAS, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM, DESOM, VENGARA VIA THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. VYSAKH NANDAN C., AGED 16 YEARS (MINOR), S/O.SADANANDAN, REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND GUARDIAN DEEPA, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O.LATE SREEDHARAN PANICKER, DEEPA NIVAS, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM, DESOM, VENGARA P.O., THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. MEDHA NANDAN C., D/O.SADANANDAN, AGED 11 YEARS (MINOR), REP.BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN DEEPA, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O.LATE SREEDHARAN PANICKER, DEEPA NIVAS, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM DESOM, VENGARA P.O. THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.DEEPA C (PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- SADANANDAN P, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.ACHUTHAN NAIR, KANAKA VILLAS, KOTTUR, INDIANUR P.O., KOTTAKAL, MALAPPURAM - 676 503.

BY ADV. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-102015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O.P.(FC)425/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXTS:

EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF PETITION IS O.P.432/13 BEFORE TIRUR FAMILY COURT. EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF PETITION IS O.P.185/13 BEFORE TIRUR FAMILY COURT. EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF PETITION IS M.C.155/13 BEFORE TIRUR FAMILY COURT. EXT.P4- CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.(FC)123/2015 BEFORE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

EXT.P5- APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, TIRUR. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE.

sl.

C.K.Abdul Rehim & Mary Joseph, JJ.

==================================== O.P.(FC) No.425 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 5th day of October, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Abdul Rehim, J.

1. There was no representation for the petitioners when the case was taken up for consideration on 30.9.2015. Hence the case was adjourned to today. Today also there is no representation for the petitioners.

2. It is noticed that the limited relief sought for in this original petition is for a direction to the court below to dispose of Ext.P5 application. When the case came up for admission on 11.9.2015, this court had issued an interim direction to the Family Court, Tirur to consider Ext.P5 application and to pass appropriate orders before proceeding with the final hearing and disposal of the original petitions. It is to be noticed that the interim direction would serve the purpose of the above original petition.

O.P.(FC) No.425 of 2015 -:2:- Under the above mentioned circumstances, this original petition is hereby disposed of making the interim direction as absolute. C.K.Abdul Rehim, Judge.

Mary Joseph, Judge.

sl.