← Library
High Court of KeralaOP(Crl.)/243/2014dismissed as infructuous

T.V.Thrivikraman v. Sunanda

2015-02-06Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 OP(Crl.).No. 243 of 2014 (Q) ----------------------------- IN MC 56/2009 of FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- T.V.THRIVIKRAMAN AGED 39 YEARS S/O.T.P.THANKAPPAN, THRAYAMBHAKOM VEEDU CHITTUMALA MURI, EAST KALLADA, KOLLAM BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN(THIRUVALLA) SRI.N.B.RAJU RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. SUNANDA, AGED 34 YEARS D/O.A.P.CHANDRAN, SARASWATHI BHAVAN, SNEHA NAGAR-124 AYATHIL CHERRY, KOLLAM

2. ARCHA(MINOR), AGED 7 YEARS D/O.THRIVIKRAMAN, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER SUNANDA SARASWATHI BHAVAN, SNEHA NAGAR -124, AYATHIL CHERRY KOLLAM.

R1,R 2 BY ADV. SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) R1,R 2 BY ADV. SMT.C.VIJAYAKUMARI THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sab

OP(Crl.).No. 243 of 2014 (Q) ----------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 COPY F THE ORDER IN MC 56/2009 DATED 22/10/2009 OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE PETITION CRL.MP NO. 399/2011 IN MC 56/2009 FOR CONDONING THE DELAY EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE PETITION CRL.MP NO.400/2011 IN MC 56/2009 FOR SETTING ASIDE EXPARTE ORDER EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE MEMO AND POSTING PROFILE OF 10 YEARS DATED 12//3/2013 ISSUED FROM AIR FORCE EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF COMMON ORDER DATED 8/8/2014 IN CRL.MP NO.399/2011 AND 400/2011 IN MC 56/2009 EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF COMPROMOSE PETITION DATED 7/4/2014 IN OS 305/2006 OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------

P.UBAID, J.

------------------------- O.P (Crl.) No. 243 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this original petition with liberty to file Revision Petition against the impugned order, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act. Permission for withdrawal is granted on submission, and accordingly, this original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is permitted to take back the the trial court's order for filing appropriate proceedings.

P.UBAID, JUDGE sab