Rajeev.V v. Madhusoodanan..E.V
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 OP(KAT).No. 73 of 2015 (Z) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA 1594/2014 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 29-12-2014.
PETITIONER(S)/ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 29,30 & 31: -------------------------------------------------
1. RAJEEV V, AGED 47 YEARS, LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-I, VETERINARY SUB CENTRE NJANGATTIRI, VIA.PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 303.
2. SURESH BABU T.A., LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-I, VETERINARY SUB CENTRE VILAYOOR, PALAKKAD-679 309.
3. JAGATHJEEVAN T.K., LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-I, VETERINARY SUB CENTRE THENKURUSSY, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.N.MANU THAMPI RESPONDENT(S)/APPLICANTS & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ---------------------------------------------
1. MADHUSOODANAN E.V, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.LATE KUNHAMBU NAMBIAR, LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-II, ICDP SUB CENTRE, VALIYAPOYIL, KASARAGOD-671 313, RESIDING AT PERINGETH HOUSE, PILICODE.P.O., KASARAGOD, KERALA-671 310.
.....2
-2-
2. SURESH KUMAR P.R, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.P.RAJAPPAN, LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-II, ICDP SUB CENTRE, PERUVAYAL, PERUMANNA KOZHIKODE-673 016, RESIDING AT ARCHANA, KOTTAMPARAMBU.P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 008.
3. JAGESH KLUMAR V.V, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.O.P.VELAYUDHAN, LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-II ICDP SUB CENTRE, CHELIYA, CHENGOTTUKAVU, KOYILANDI, KOZHIKODE-673 306, RESIDING AT OMKARAM CHENGOTTUKAVU, KOYILANDI, KOZHIKODE, KERALA-673 306.
4. ALPHONSE T, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.LATE T.D.THOMAS, LIVESTOCK INSPECTOR GRADE-II ICDP SUB CENTRE, KOCHU THOVALA, P.O.KOCHU THOVALA KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI-685 508, RESIDING AT THEYINKAL SEETHATHODE.P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-689 667.
5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE(ANIMAL HUSBANDRY-E) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
6. THE DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
7. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.S.C.OFFICE, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(KAT).No. 73 of 2015 (Z) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ P1- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT IN KERALA GAZETTE DATED 11.06.1991 AS CATEGORY NO.10/91.
P2- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT IN KERALA GAZETTE DATED 13.02.1996 IN CATEGORY NO.10/91.
P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISED INTER-SE COMBINED LIST FORWARDED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT AS PER COMMUNICATION NO.D.R.1(1) 2996/96/G.O. DATED 15.09.2008.
P4- TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.(MS) NO.63/2009/AD DATED 21.03.2009.
P5- TRUE COPY OF THE O.A.NO.1594/2014.
P6TRUE COPY OF THE M.A.NO.2442/2014 IN O.A.NO.1594/2014.
P7- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN THE O.A.NO.1594/2014.
P8- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL DATED 29.12.2014 IN O.A.NO.1594/2014.
P9- TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION GIVEN BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE DISTRICT OFFICER, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, MALAPPURAM DATED 22.01.2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ NIL //true copy// P.S. to Judge
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & K. HARILAL, JJ.
--------------------------------------------------------- O.P. (KAT) No.73 of 2015-Z ---------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
This Original Petition is filed invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India. At the best, the petitioner can seek relief against Ext.P8 order of the Tribunal. We do not see any ground for the petitioner to collateral seek reliefs (i), (ii) and (iii) which are much above, or even different from, the subject matter of the Original Application, that was before the Tribunal and on which, Ext.P8 order was issued. We also record the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala Public Service Commission that the P.S.C. has been impleaded as the 7th respondent in this original petition, though it was not a party before the Tribunal. The aforesaid, necessarily, indicates that the
O.P. (KAT) No.73 of 2015 -: 2 :- original petition, as laid, is not maintainable. Hence this original petition is dismissed without prejudice to the petitioners' right to challenge Ext.P8 order of the Tribunal appropriately.
Sd/- (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge