Celin John v. T.J.Joseph

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2015/2ND SRAVANA, 1937 RFA.No. 227 of 2013 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 86/2006 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, KOCHI DATED 18-10-2012 APPELLANT(S):/PLAINTIFFS ------------------------ 1.

CELIN JOHN, AGED 67 YEARS, W/O.LATE JOHN, PARACKAL HOUSE NOW RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.III/888-13, K.K.ROAD CHEMBUMUKKU, B.M.C.P.O., KOCHI-682 021.

2.

MARY GEORGE, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.GEORGE, CHETTYVEETTIL HOUSE, NEAR S.H.COLLEGE THEVARA.

3.

PHILOMINA XAVIER, AGED 64 YEARS, W/O.XAVIER, MULLACHETH HOUSE, NEAR ST.DOMINIC CHURCH, ALUVA.

4.

BABY VARGHESE, AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.VARGHESE, MADATHIL HOUSE, PADINJAREKARA P.O.

VALLAKAM, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.JAISON JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS IN THE SUIT:

---------------------------------------------------- 1.

T.J.JOSEPH @ JOY, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.JOHN, THYVEETTIL HOUSE, THOPPUMPADY KOCHI-682005.

2.

T.J.FRANCIS, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.JOHN, THYVEETTIL HOUSE, THOPPUMPADY KOCHI-682005, AND NOW RESIDING AT DOOR NO.287 PLOT NO.242, RAJ VIJAR NAGAR, EACHARI P.O.

POLLACHI MAIN ROAD, COIMBATORE-21.

RFA227/13 3.

VALSA THOMAS, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.T.J.THOMAS, THYVEETTIL HOUSE, THOPPUMPADY KOCHI-682 005.

4.

SNEHA THOMAS, AGED 10 YEARS, D/O.T.J.THOMAS REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VALSA THOMAS THYVEETTIL HOUSE, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-682 005. R1 BY ADV. SRI.PAUL MATHEW (PERUMPILLIL) R1 BY ADV. SRI.PRASUN.S R2 to R4 BY ADV.SRI.NIREESH MATHEW THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.

.................................................................... RFA No.227 of 2013 .................................................................... Dated this the 24th day of July, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

Mediation settlement agreement dated 08.07.2015 is recorded. The impugned decree will stand superseded by this judgment, in terms of the mediation settlement agreement, which will stand appended to the judgment. The mediation settlement agreement along with this judgment will be treated as decree for all intents and purposes. Drafting of separate decree is dispensed with. This RFA is ordered accordingly.

(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE) jg