P.M.Ahammed Kannu v. T.V.Udayakaran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2015/17TH ASHADHA, 1937 RP.No. 1187 of 2008 (A) IN WP(C).33398/2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 33398/2004 .....................

REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 4, 6 TO 9:

1. P.M.AHAMMED KANNU, CONCENOR, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, SURABHI, ALAPPARA VEEDU, VIZHINJAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM.

2. ROSAMMA ANTONY, PALOORATHY HOUSE, CHERTHALA, ALLEPPEY.

3. SREEKUMARI C.RAJA, DEVI SADANAM, PANNIYANKARA, KALLAI, KOZHIKODE.

4. P.G.THANKAMMA, PUTHENTHARA HOUSE, THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O., KOTTAYAM.

5. MAYANDI, CHIRAVATTOM HOUSE, VERCOLY P.O., POLPULLY, PALAKKAD.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS:

1. T.V.UDAYAKARAN, PRESIDENT, MUHAMMA PANCHAYAT HANDICRAFTS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.A. 130, MUHAMMA P.O., ALLEPPEY.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, TRIVANDRUM.

3. THE REGISTRAR OF INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES/THE DIRECTOR INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKAS BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM.

4. THE KERALA STATE HANDICRAFTS APEX CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.231, (SURABHI) M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-16 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

R1 BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

------------------------------------------- R.P.No.1187 of 2008 in W.P.(C)No.33398 of 2004 A -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of July, 2015

ORDER

Both the learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents submitted that in the light of the subsequent developments and changed circumstances, neither the directions in the judgment under review nor the review petition itself survives for consideration.

In the facts and circumstances, without prejudice to the rights of either of the parties to the proceedings, the review petition is closed as having not survived for further consideration.

Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv