← Library
High Court of KeralaRSA/279/2012dismissed as not pressed

George Thomas v. Marykutty Varghese

2015-11-04Honourable Mr. Justice P.B.Suresh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 RSA.No. 279 of 2012 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS. NO.156/2008 OF DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 01-09-2011.

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS. NO.271/2005 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DATED 19-09-2008.

......

APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS :

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. GEORGE THOMAS, EETTIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KIZHAVALLOOR, PRAMADOM VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT 1148, HAIVEY, R.R.I., BOX 1091 BRD, STOOD BURG, P.A.18360-9723 US.

2. LILLY MARVA @ LEELAMMA, -DO-, NOW RESIDING AT 82-19-62 AVE, MIDDLE VILLAGE, NEW YORK, 11379, USA.

3. JOSE THOMAS, -DO-, NOW RESIDING AT 48 QUENNES AVE, ELMONT, YORK 11003, USA.

4. SHERLY THOMAS, MANNIL HOUSE, THANNITHODU VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT -DO- -DO-.

5. SHYNI, -DO- -DO-

6. SHIJA DAVID, -DO- -DO-

7. KUNJAMMA OOMEN, PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR, PRAMADOM VILLAGE.

8. SOMINI BABY, BARBARA STREET, ELMONT, NEW YORK-11003.

9. THANKAMMA, -DO- -DO-.

(APPELLANTS 1 TO 6, 8 & 9 REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KUNJAMMA OOMEN 7TH APPELLANT). BY ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN.

RSA.No. 279 of 2012 RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:

------------------------------------------------------------- MARYKUTTY VARGHESE @ MARY, EETTIMOOTTIL HOUSE, KIZHAVALLOOR, PRAMADOM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERY, NOW RESIDING AT 77-48, 252 STREET, BELLEROS, NEW YORK-11426, USA.

BY ADVS. SRI.KISHOR B., SRI.TOMS MATHEW.

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = R.S.A.No.279 of 2012.

= = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th day of November, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the second appeal is not pressed. In the light of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

Kvs/- // True copy // P.A. TO JUDGE.