← Library
High Court of KeralaRSA/387/2008dismissed as withdrawn

Santhosh v. Narayanan

2015-01-21Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2015/1ST MAGHA, 1936 RSA.No. 387 of 2008 ( ) ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 311/2006 of IST ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 25-10-2007.

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 119/1998 of MUNSIFF COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 11-09-2002.

APPELLANTS IN R.S.A.- ADDL. APPELLANTS 3 & 4 IN A.S- LRs OF PLAINTIFF IN SUIT : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. SANTHOSH, S/O. CHANDRAN, PONNACHERY, MUNAMBAM KARA, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.

2. MOHANAN, S/O. -DO- IN -DO- -DO- BY ADVS.SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR (SENIOR) SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SMT.V.DEEPA.

RESPONDENT(S) IN RSA - RESPONDENTS & ADDL.APPELLANTS IN A.S.- DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2, ADDL.DEFENDANT NO.3 7 LRs OF PLAINTIFF IN SUIT : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. NARAYANAN, S/O. ALUMKAL SANNAPPAN, ALUNGAL, PALLIPURAM MURI, KOCHI TALUK.

2. BABU, S/O. SREEDHARAN, RAMADY, PALLIPURAM MURI, KOCHI TALUK.

3. SANTHA, D/O. SANNAPPAN, ALUNGAL, PALLIPURAM MURI, KOCHI TALUK.

4. RAMESAN, S/O. CHANDRAN,PONNACHERY, MUNAMBAM KARA, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.

5. RASHALA, D/O. -DO- IN -DO- -DO- (APPELLANT NO.1 BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT, NALINI, IS DEAD. HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES WERE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.2276 OF 2004). R1 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: amk

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------------------------ R.S.A No.387 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of January, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo dated 14th January, 2015 stating that the appellants do not wish to prosecute the appeal. Hence, the regular second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

amk