Geetha Devi v. Sathi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RFA.No. 22 of 2015 () ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 733/2012 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 26-08-2014 APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:

-------------------- GEETHA DEVI, AGED 59 YEARS D/O.RAGHAVAN, PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, UDAYAMPEROOR.P.O MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.VAKKOM N.VIJAYAN SMT.V.RENJU SRI.P.ANIYAN RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:

--------------------- SATHI,, AGED 69 YEARS W/O.VISWANBHARAN, PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, PANANGADU KUMBALAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM-682 506.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN R1 BY ADV. SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ R1 BY ADV. SRI.JITHIN PAUL VARGHESE R1 BY ADV. SMT.CHITHRA.S.BABU R1 BY ADV. SMT.M.PRIYANKA M.P.

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.

============================== R.F.A.No.22 of 2015 ============================== Dated this the 25th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.

Appeal admitted. Parties appear through counsel. 2.

Memorandum of settlement agreement perused. The same is recorded and a decree is passed in terms of compromise in supersession of the impugned decree of the court below. The memorandum of settlement will stand appended to this judgment and this judgment along with appended memorandum of settlement will be treated as a decree for all intents and purposes. Drafting of separate decree is dispensed with.

Appeal ordered accordingly.

Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS Judge Sbna