State Of Kerala v. Satheesh Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/2ND CHAITHRA, 1937 RP.No. 649 of 2013 () IN WP(C).22521/2012 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22521/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-11-2012 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 IN WRIT PETITION: --------------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM, PIN-673001.
3. THE AGRICULTURAL FILED OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, MANJERI, PIN-676121.
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM, PIN-673001.
BY SHRI P.K. SOUZ, GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & 5TH RESPONDENT IN WP(C): -------------------------------------------------------
1. SATHEESH KUMAR, S/O, EDAKATTUKUNDIL CHATHUNNI, KARUVAMBRAM MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676121.
2. THE MANJERI MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN-673001.
R BY SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) R BY SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-03-2015, ALONG WITH RP 653/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.Nos.649 and 653 of 2013 in W.P.(C) Nos.22521/2012 and 22524/2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF MARCH, 2015 O R D ER The review petitions are filed by the State along with other official respondents. The apparent contention raised is that the properties involved being paddy and wet land, and as the items of properties have been included in the draft data bank, if objections are there for the respondents, they will have to approach the concerned Local Level Monitoring Committee. On the last occasion, the matter was adjourned to verify whether the final notification has been published and it is informed by the learned Government Pleader that the final notification is yet to be published. Therefore, the judgments in the writ petitions are recalled and the review petitions are allowed.
(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/