Abu Thahir v. Noorjahan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 RPFC.No. 239 of 2013 () ------------------------ MC 135/2006 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD REVISION PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------------------------------ ABU THAHIR S/O.LATE SYED MOHAMMAD, CHALLAPATHAYIL, KOZHIKNJAMPARA CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL SRI.K.NIRMALAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. NOORJAHAN, AGED 39 YEARS CHAKKIRIKULAMBU, PERUVEMBA PALAKKAD TALUK PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VADAKKETHERUVU KOZHINJAMPARA P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

2. SAJIRA, AGED 19 YEARS W/O.MOHAMMED FIROZ, CHAKKIRIKULAMBU, PERUVEMBA PALAKKAD TALUK PRESENTLY RESIDING AT PONVILA NAGAR UKKADAM P.O., COIMBATORE, STATE OF TAMIL NADU.

3. SHAHIRA, AGED 17 YEARS CHAKKIRIKULAMBU, PERUVEMBA PALAKKAD TALUK PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VADAKKETHERUVU KOZHINJAMPARA P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY MOTHER, NOORJAHAN, VADAKKETHERUVU KOZHINJAMPARA P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

4. SHANFAR, AGED 13 YEARS CHAKKIRIKULAMBU, PERUVEMBA PALAKKAD TALUK PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VADAKKETHERUVU KOZHINJAMPARA P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY MOTHER, NOORJAHAN, VADAKKETHERUVU KOZHINJAMPARA P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

5. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

R1, R3&R4 BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - R.P.(F.C.) No.239 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of December 2015

O R D E R

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that the matter has been settled in mediation. Since the matter has been settled in mediation, this revision petition stands closed, recording the terms of compromise. Sd/ B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE dl/.14.12..2015 // True Copy // PA to Judge