High Court of KeralaRSA/154/2011dismissed as withdrawn

Sreenivasan @ Sreeni & ORS v. Sarada & Others

2015-02-03Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/14TH MAGHA, 1936 RSA.No. 154 of 2011 ( ) ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 124/2006 of II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM DATED 24-09-2009.

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 841/2001 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, TRIVANDRUM DATED 23-12-2005.

APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:

------------------------------------------------------------

1. SREENIVASAN ALIAS SREENI, S/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 57 YEARS, SREENI NIVAS, THATTANVILAKOM, ARUMANOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. SYALAMA,D/O.LEKSHMI,AGED 54 YEARS, KAVUPAZHANJI VEEDU, ARUMANOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAJESH KANNAN.

SRI.A.S.SHAMMY RAJ.

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. SARADA,D/O.LAKSHMI,AGED 65 YEARS, LAKSHMI BHAVAN, ARUMANOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 027.

2. VISWAMBARAN,S/O.NARAYANAN,AGED 60 YEARS, KAVUPAZHANJI VEEDU, ARUMANOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 027.

3. M.N.PRASAD,AGED 44 YEARS,JYOTHI NIVAS, THEKKEKAVUPAZHANJI, ARUMANNOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 027.

RSA.No. 154 of 2011 ( ) -2-

4. M.RAJAN,AGED 38 YEARS, THEKKEKAVUPAZHANJI VEEDU, ARUMANOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 027.

5. M.SREENATH,AGED 35 YEARS, THEKKEKAVUPAZHANJI VEEDU, ARUMANOOR, POOVAR POST, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 027. R2 TO 5 BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN.

SMT.M.A.ZOHRA.

SRI.R.S.MADHU.

SRI.MAHESH ANANDAKUTTAN.

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: amk

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------------------------ R.S.A No.154 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo dated 22-01-2015 stating that the parties have settled the matter and there is no need to proceed with the appeal. It is also requested that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Hence, the regular second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There is no order as to costs.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. Sd/- A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

amk //True copy// P.A to Judge