High Court of KeralaRP/33/2015disposed of

Hari Narayanan C.V v. The District Supply Officer

2015-01-14Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/24TH POUSHA, 1936 RP.No. 33 of 2015 ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 31111/2014, DATED 21-11-2014 -------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------------------ HARI NARAYANAN C.V, (ARD NO.38), APPOOS, CHOLLOTTU PARAMB THENHIPALAM.P.O- 673 636, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

------------------------------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES COMMISSIONERATE OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

5. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Review Petition No.33 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14 th day of January, 2015

O R D E R

The writ petition was disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider and finalise Ext.P8 revision petition filed by the petitioner within two months as specified therein. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner pointing out that revenue recovery proceedings have already been initiated and as such it was omitted to be incorporated in the judgment to have the same kept in abeyance till the revision petition was finalised. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. After hearing both the sides, this review petition is disposed of making it clear that the coercive proceedings if any shall be kept in abeyance till final orders are passed by the 4th respondent in Ext.P8 revision petition.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE sj