← Library
High Court of KeralaRP/67/2015dismissed

Lijoy P.Varghese v. Linson P.Varghese

2015-03-25Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/4TH CHAITHRA, 1937 RP.No. 67 of 2015 () IN RSA.1075/2014 --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RSA 1075/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-10-2014 REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:

------------------------------------------------ LIJOY P. VARGHESE, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.LATE PARACKAL DEVASSY VARGHESE, ADVOCATE, RESIDING AT PARACKAL BHAVAN, 44/2401, FRIENDS LANE-4, DESHABHIMANI VIA, KALOOR DESOM, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COCHIN: 682 017. BY ADV. SRI.LIJOY P.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------------------------------

1. LINSON P.VARGHESE, S/O.LATE PARACKAL DEVASSY VARGHESE, CIVIL CONTRACTOR, RESIDING AT PARACKAL BHAVAN, 44/2401, FRIENDS LANE -4, DESHABHIMANI VIA, KALOOR DESOM, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COCHIN - 682 017.

2. GRACY VARGHESE, W/O.LATE PARACKAL DEVASSY VARGHESE, HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT PARACKAL BHAVAN, 44/2401, FRIENDS LANE -4, DESHABHIMANI VIA, KALOOR DESOM, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COCHIN - 682 017.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.VISWANATHAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

RP NO. 67/2015 IN RSA NO. 1075/2014 APPENDIX ANNEXURE 1 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HONOURABLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT AT ERNAKULAM ON 16.11.2010. ANNEXURE 2 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO. 6320/2010 IN OS NO. 934/2009 FILED BEFORE THE HONOURABLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFFS COURT AT ERNAKULAM.

ANNEXURE 3 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE IA BNO. 7423/2010 IN OS NO. 934/2009 FILED BEFORE THE HONOURABLE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT AT ERNAKULAM.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- R.P. NO. 67 OF 2015 IN R.S.A. NO. 1075 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of March, 2015

ORDER

The parties are present in the Court. The dispute is primarily between the mother and the son. The same could not be settled despite valiant efforts.

I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record. The Review Petition is dismissed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd