The Authorised Officer (Chief Manager) v. Rajan P.Karappan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/14TH MAGHA, 1936 RP.No. 95 of 2015 (A) ------------------------------------ (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 29806/2014 DATED 11/11/2014) -------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS :
------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER (CHIEF MANAGER), STATE BANK OF INDIA, RETAIL ASSETS CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE, 1ST FLOOR, VENKARATH TOWERS, N.H.BYE PASS JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682 024
2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, PUTHUVYPE BRANCH, KOCHI-682 511 BY ADV. SRI.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS :
-------------------------------------------------
1. RAJAN P. KARAPPAN, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.KARAPPAN, PALATHINKAL HOUSE, MALIPPURAM.P.O., VYPIN, ERNAKULAM-682 511
2. SOUMINI RAJAN, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.RAJAN, PALATHINKAL HOUSE, MALIPPURAM P.O., VYPIN, ERNAKULAM-682 511 R1 & R2 BY SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
R.P.NO.95/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.29806/2014 (A) RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R.P. No. 95 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No. 29806 of 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 3rd day of February, 2015
O R D E R
The writ petition was disposed of, based on the submission made by the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents that the total overdue amount was Rs.45,000/-, in turn directing the petitioner to satisfy the said amount within one month and to have the account regularized, subject to satisfaction of the requirement as above. The review petition has been filed by the respondent Bank pointing out that actual overdue amount was Rs.1,45,000/- and not Rs. 45,000/-, and as such the verdict requires to be modified accordingly.
2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that after passing the verdict, a sum of Rs. 66,000/- has been satisfied towards the overdue. The learned counsel for the review petitioner points out that after giving credit to the said amount, the balance amount for regularization would come nearly Rs.42,000/-.
R.P. No. 95 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No. 29806 of 2014 : 2 :
3. In the said circumstances, the petitioner is directed to clear the entire overdue amount on or before 28.02.2015, subject to which the petitioner shall continue to avail the benefit of the judgment already passed by this Court on 11.11.2014. The Review petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd