Padmakshy v. Sasidharan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/1ST POUSHA, 1937 RSA.No. 128 of 2013 F ------------------------------ JUDGMENT DATED 06-10-2012 IN AS 21/2010 OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-II, MAVELIKKARA JUDGMENT DATED 15-01-2010 IN OS 118/2008 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, MAVELIKKARA .........

APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF IN OS :

------------------------------------------------------------------- PADMAKSHY, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O. KARTHIKEYAN, DYAPURACKAL VEEDU, FROM CHANKOOR VEEDU, KAITHA NORTH MURI, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.JACOB CHACKO SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS & ADDL. SECOND PLAINTIFF IN O.S. : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. SASIDHARAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. MADHAVAN, PLANKEEZHIL VEEDU, KAITHA NORTH MURI, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 101.

2. PRAKASH, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. MADHAVAN, PLANKEEZHIL VEEDU, KAITHA NORTH MURI, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 101.

R1 BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

----------------------------------- R.S.A.No.128 of 2013 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instruction from the appellant to pursue this matter. In the light of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed for default.

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

smm