Jameela Basheer v. Jaimon John

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/9TH KARTHIKA, 1936 RFA.No. 224 of 2014 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 269/2012 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM DATED 29-11-2013 -------------------- APPELLANT(S)/1ST & 3RD DEFENDANTS :- ---------------------------------------

1. JAMEELA BASHEER, AGED 54 YEARS W/O.BASHEER RESIDING AT KOMPANAPARAMBIL HOUSE NATTASSERY KARA, PERUMBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

2. SAJINA BASHEER, AGED 26 YEARS D/O.BASHEER RESIDING AT KOMPANAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NATTASSERY KARA, PERUMBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM SMT.REXY ELIZABETH THOMAS RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF AND 2ND AND 4TH DEFENDANTS :- -------------------------------------------------------

1. JAIMON JOHN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.JOHN, KEEZHEDATHU HOUSE ATHIRAMPUZHA PADINGATTUMBHAGAM KARA ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT NOW RESIDING AT SREESHYLAM HOUSE C/O.P.R.CHELLAPPAN, ONAMTHURUTH KARA ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 001.

2. RAGEENA BASHEER, AGED 28 YEARS, D/O.BASHEER RESIDING AT KOMPANAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NATTASSERY KARA PERUMBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 001.

RFA.No. 224 of 2014 () -----------------------

3. ANSALNA, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O.BASHEER RESIDING AT KOMPANAPARAMBIL HOUSE, NATTASSERY KARA PERUMBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 001.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.P.MOHAMMED NIYAZ SRI.M.P.MUHAMMAD FAZIL SRI.K.RONALD JOSE SMT.AUGNES LOVELY FRANCIS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-10-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Jvt

P.N.RAVINDRAN & P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JJ.

-------------------------------------------------------------- R.F.A. No.224 of 2014 --------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of October 2014

J U D G M E N T

Ravindran, J.

This appeal was admitted and notice ordered to the respondents on 19.3.2014. The appellants have, however, not so far paid the balance court fee payable in the appeal. They have also not applied for enlargement of time to pay the balance court fee. In such circumstances, this appeal is rejected for nonpayment of the court fee in full. In view of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Jamal v. Mohammedkutty [2003 (3) KLT 803], the Registry is directed to refund the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal, to the appellants. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE.

Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

//True copy// P.A. To Judge Jvt