K.Krishna Kumar v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/6TH PHALGUNA, 1936 JUDGMENT DATED 06-01-2015 IN WP(C) 136/2015 ........

REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/WRIT PETITIONERS:

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. K.KRISHNA KUMAR, AWD-18, WEST HILL, CALICUT - 673 005.

2. S.RAGISH, AWD NO.17, WEST HILL, CALICUT.

3. SOUMINI RAGHAVAN, MANAGING PARTNER, MADHAVI TRADING CORPORATION, AWD NO. 11, J.T. ROAD, VATAKARA, CALICUT DISTRICT.

4. SUMA, PROPRIETOR, MAMATHA TRADERS, AWD NO. 11/15, VATAKARA, CALICUT DISTRICT.

5. FABITHA V.C., AWD NO.8, J.T. ROAD, VATAKARA, CALICUT DISTIRCT.

6. K.T.ABDU RAHIMAN HAJEE & CO.

AWD NO. 10, J.T. ROAD, VATAKARA, CALICUT DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.V. MAMMOO.

7. O.K.AGENCIES, AWD NO.3, MAIN ROAD, QUILANDY, CALICUT DISTRICT-673 305, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K. FATHIMA.

8. K.V.MOOSA KOYA & CO.

AWD NO. 5, BEACH ROAD, KOYILANDY, CALICUT DISTRICT - 673 305.

-2-

-2-

9. CRESCENT COMMERCIAL STORE, AWD NO.6, BEACH ROAD, QUILANDY, CALICUT DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P. SALEEM.

10. MUBARAK TRADERS, AWD NO.2, BEACH ROAD, KOYILANDY, CALICUT DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P. BEEVI UMMA.

11. UNITED TRADERS, AWD NO.1, BEACH ROAD, KOYILANDY, CALICUT DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, V.T. SYED.

12. RASITHA S., AWD NO.20, WEST HILL, CALICUT-5.

13. KOZHIKODE JILLA RATION DEALERS'

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED D.NO.2659, AWD NO.22, KOYILANDY KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY K. JALAJA.

14. THE QUILANDY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.F-1869, AWD NO.4, KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K.A. AJAYAKUMAR.

15. M.V. PRAKASH, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. M. VASUDEVAN, AUTHORISED WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTOR, OPP: KUTTIPURAM RAILWAY STATION, TIRUR TALUK, KUTTIPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

16. P.MOHAMMED MAYAN, AWD NO.2, OORAKAM, VENGARA, TIRURANGADI TALUK.

17. SHAJI AND COMPANY, AWD NO.8, PARAPPANANGADI, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, SHAJI KURUNIAYAN. BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE -3-

-3RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN W.P.[C]:

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3. THE COMMISSIONER, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, OPPOSITE MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

4. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICE, THRISSUR - 680 001.

5. THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA REGIONAL OFFICE, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICER AND REGIONAL GENERAL MANAGER.

6. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SUDHEESH KUMAR R5 & R6 BY ADVS. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN, SC SRI.K.M.ABDUL MAJEED THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

------------------------------- R.P.NO.192 OF 2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.136 OF 2015 (N) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2015

O R D E R

This review petition has been filed by the petitioners to seek a correction of the cause title of the writ petition, so as to insert the name and address of the correct respondents against whom directions had to be issued. It is pointed out that in the writ petition, the authority to whom the direction was to be issued was wrongly shown as the District Supply Officer, Thrissur instead of the District Supply Officer, Kozhikode and District Supply Officer, Malappuram. It is pointed out that inasmuch as the writ petition was disposed by judgment dated 6.1.2015, a correction in the cause title of the writ petition can be effected only if the said judgment is first recalled. Taking note of the submission of counsel for the review petitioners, and to enable them to effect the correction in the cause title in the writ petition, the judgment dated 6.1.2015 is recalled, and the writ petition is posted after ten days. The petitioner is directed to take

R.P.NO.192 OF 2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.136 OF 2015 steps to carry out the correction in the cause title of the writ petition, by then.

The review petition is accordingly allowed.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp