Parakkadavu Grama Panchayath v. Joemon Joseph

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2015/5TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RP.No. 268 of 2015 -------------------------- WP(C) 31963/2014, DATED 28-11-2014 --------------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN WPC:-: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. PARAKKADAVU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KURUMASSERRY P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 579.

2. THE SECRETARY, PARAKKADAVU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KURUMASSERRY P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 579.

BY ADV. SRI.K.B.DAYAL RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:-:

------------------------------------------------------- JOEMON JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH, EDATHALA HOUSE, NEELLEESWARAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 035.

BY SRI.BABU S. NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

RP.No. 268 of 2015 -------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES --------------------------------------- A1:

COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.2 DATED 16/7/14 OF THE 1ST REVIEW PETITIONER GRAMA PANCHAYAT.

A2:

COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST REVIEW PETITIONER GRAMA PANCHAYAT TO THE RESPONDNET DATED 10/9/14 NO.A4-4548/14 A3:

COPY OF THE FRESH APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 25/4/14 TO THE 1ST REVIEW PETITIONER GRAMA PANCHAYAT A4:

COPY OF THE FRESH APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 25/7/14 TO THE 1ST REVIEW PETITIONER GRAMA PANCHAYAT A5:

COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.20 OF THE 1ST REVIEW PETITIONER GRAMA PANCHAYAT, DATED 29/9/14 A6:

COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.27 OF THE 1ST REVIEW PETITIONER GRAMA PANCHAYAT, DATED 21/10/14 A7:

COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED 16/12/14 RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE ---------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

============== R.P.No.268 of 2015 in W.P (C) No.31963 of 2014 ====================== Dated this, the 26th day of May, 2015

O R D E R

This review petition is filed by the respondent Panchayat inter alia stating that Exts.P8 and P9 representations were already disposed of and communicated to the writ petitioner as per Annexure A2 dated 10/9/14. That apart, petitioners had filed fresh applications, which are pending consideration.

2.

In fact, the writ petition was disposed of as per judgment dated 28/11/14 at the admission stage itself proceeding on the basis that Exts.P8 and P9 applications are pending. As the same has already been disposed of, I do not think that there will be any necessity to pass orders in the matter.

Taking on record the aforesaid submission, the review petition is closed.

Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp