Perinthalmanna Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The District Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2015/11TH CHAITHRA, 1937 RP.No. 315 of 2015 (A) IN WP(C).19210/2012 -------------------------------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/WRIT PETITIONER:

--------------------------------------------------------------- PERINTALMANNA SERVICE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. P534, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE PERINTALMANNA-679322, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ ---------------------- 1.

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) MALAPPURAM-676501.

2.

THE SUB REGISTRAR PERINTALMANNA-679322.

3.

THE PERINTALMANNA CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD. NO. F1179, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PERINTALMANNA-679322.

4.

THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & ALEXANDER THOMAS, JJ.

================== R.P.No. 315 of 2015 in W.P.(C).No.19210/2012 ================== Dated this the 1st day of April, 2015

O R D E R

ANTONY DOMINIC, J.:

Having heard the counsel for both sides, we are not inclined to think that the judgment requires to be reviewed as prayed for. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. But, however, we find that the word, 'refund' used in the judgment is a mistake and the said word will stand substituted by the word, 'remission'. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Sd/- sdk+ ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.S. to Judge