Thankappan v. Saithu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RSA.No. 552 of 2011 (G) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 89/2010 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 22-10-2010 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 201/2007 of MUNSIFF COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 08-04-2010 APPELLANT/DEFENDANT/APPELLANT BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THANKAPPAN, S/O.VALLON, KUMBELIPARAMBIL, PEREPPADOM COLONY KIZHAKKUMPURAM MURI, CHENDAMANGALAM VILLAGE, PARAVUR THALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SAITHU, S/O.KUNJUMARAKKAR, KANNAMKULATHU, PEREPPADOM COLONY, KIZHAKKUMPARAM MURI CHENDAMANGALAM VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK-683 513. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.G.HARIKRISHNAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AS

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------------------------ R.S.A.No.552 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel filed memo dated 4.6.2015 stating that he has relinquished vakalath after sending a registered intimation letter to the appellant. The matter comes up in the defect list. In spite of giving various opportunities the legal heirs of deceased respondent were not impleaded. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

AS