The Manager v. Jubair K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2015/8TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RP.No. 384 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------- JUDGMENT DATED 20-02-2015 IN WP(C) 5436/2015 .......
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/4TH RESPONDENT:
-------------------------------------------------------------- THE MANAGER, HIDAYATHUL MUSLIM YATHEEMKHANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MANJERI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 121.
BY ADV. SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. JUBAIR K., AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMEDALI K, KHAIMA, UGRAPURAM P.O., AREA CODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 639.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE - 693 001.
R2 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.T.SHEEBA R1 BY SRI.P.K.MOHAMED JAMEEL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
RP.No. 384 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.5.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE 2: TRUE COPY OF THE SALARY STATEMENT OF THE TEACHERS OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE MONTHS OF JANUARY, FEBRUARY AND MARCH 2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
******************************************************* R.P.No.384 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No.5436 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 29th day of May, 2015
ORDER
This Review Petition is filed by the Manager aggrieved by the directions of this Court that if any appointment is made in the post of HSST (Computer Science) by the Manager shall not be approved by the third respondent. It is submitted that the approval was already granted on 5.2.2015. Thus, the judgment is clarified that any approval already granted to any appointment before the judgment will not be governed by the directions and those appointee will be entitled for all the benefits in accordance with law.
The Review Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln