Magi @ Maggie Antony v. Christina Cleetus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RP.No. 445 of 2015 () IN MACA.2481/2012 ----------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MACA 2481/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18-03-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER(S):APPELLANTS 1 TO 3 ----------------------------------------

1. MAGI @ MAGGIE ANTONY W/O.LATE ANTONY, KAINIKKATT HOUSE, KUMBALANGHI COCHIN - 7

2. K.A.VINOD, @ VINOD ANTONY K.A., S/O.LATE ANTONY KAINIKKATT HOUSE, KUMBALANGHI, COCHIN - 7

3. VIJOY @ THOMAS VIJOY K.A., S/O.LATE ANTONY, KAINIKKATT HOUSE KUMBALANGHI, COCHIN - 7.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.KOSHY SMT.V.V.RISANI RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:

----------------------------------------

1. CHRISTINA CLEETUS W/O.T.J.CLEETUS, 37/1457, THANIKOTTU HOUSE KUMARANASSAN ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI, PIN - 682 019.

2. JOHN ALOCIOUS, S/O.M.J.ANTONY, MALOTT HOUSE, EAST OF PRIYADARSHINI STOP, KUMBALANGHI, COCHIN - 682 007

3. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, KANDOMKULATHY BUILDING M.G.ROAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682 011.

R1 BY SRI.ANTONY MATHEW R2 BY SRI.K.P.JOSE PIOUS R3 BY SRI.VPK.PANICKER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.V. ASHA, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.445/2015 in M.A.C.A. No.2481/2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Asha, J.

Heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. This review petition is filed in order to clarify the judgment that the insurance company will be liable for the entire compensation, since the policy is admittedly a comprehensive policy. Similarly, it has been omitted to direct that the compensation amount will be apportioned in the ratio of 50 : 25 : 25.

2. Hence, the judgment is modified and we hold that the insurance company will be liable for the entire amount of compensation. It is also clarified that the compensation amount will be apportioned in the ratio of 50 : 25 : 25.

The review petition is accordingly disposed of. (T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) (P.V. ASHA, JUDGE.) kav/