Aravindakshan v. Vasudevan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RP.No. 492 of 2015 (O) IN OP(C).944/2015 ------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(C) 944/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 01-04-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER: (4th RESPONDENT):

---------------------------------------------- ARAVINDAKSHAN, ALINGAL HOUSE, KADAMPIDI, CHITTILENCHERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD - 678 541.

BY SRI.T. SETHUMADHAVAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS.SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.N.DEEPA RESPONDENTS: (PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 AND 5 & 6) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.

VASUDEVAN, AGED 78 YEARS, S/O. LATE KRISHNAN, KAVALODE, N.S.S COLLEGE P.O., NEMMARA, PALAKKAD.

2.

SUKUMARAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN, OONINCHUVATTIL VEEDU, MELARCODE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD - 678 703.

3.

DIWAKARAN, S/O. AYYAPPAN, 42/476, MATHAYIMANJOORAN ROAD, PACHALAM, KOCHI - 682 012.

4.

SETHUMADHAVAN, KADAMPIDI, CHITTILENCHERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD - 678 541. 5.

RAJESH, S/O. PREMAKUMARAN, KARAMPADAM, MUDAPPALLUR, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD - 678 705.

6.

RAGHAVAN, KARAMPADAM, MUNDAPPALLUR, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD - 678 705.

BY SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

P. BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 492 of 2015 in O.P.(C) No. 944 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of June, 2015.

ORDER

Objection is taken to the time frame fixed by this Court while disposing of O.P.(C) No. 944 of 2015. It is pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that several petitions are pending consideration and the time frame fixed by this Court may compel the court below not to deal with those petitions in accordance with law.

2. The above apprehension is misconceived. This Court did not intend by fixing time frame that the petitions which are pending shall not be considered in accordance with law.

3. It is made clear that the time frame fixed by this Court does not preclude the court below from disposing of the pending petitions and fresh petitions, if any, filed before it in accordance with law.

R.P.No.492 of 2015.

The Review Petition is disposed of as above.

P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.