Abdul Salam v. The Secretary, Rta, Malappuram

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937 R.P.No.512 of 2015 ----------------------------------- [AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.9593/2014-Y OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, DATED 02-04-2014.

-------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/ PETITIONER:- ------------------------------------------------------- ABDUL SALAM, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUPPIVALAVU, CHETTIPADI POST, MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN.

RESPONDENT(S)/ RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):- ---------------------------------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MALAPPURAM 676 505 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL.

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:-

K.Vinod Chandran, J.

------------------------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.512 of 2015 in W.P.(C).No.9593 of 2014-Y ------------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 02nd day of July, 2015

ORDER

The only prayer in the review petition is that, the timings directed to be settled was in accordance with Circular No.D3/875/STA/2005 dated 08.11.2011, which implementation was later considered by this Court and by judgment in W.P.(C). No.2844 of 2013 dated 21.11.2014 found that such implementation can be made only after the Regional Transport Authorities all over the State report compliance of such settlement and the State Transport Authority notifying a date for its implementation. In such circumstances, the timings shall be settled without looking into D3 Circular; however, the same shall be subject to further settlement under D3 Circular. The review petition would stand allowed.

Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge vku.

[ true copy ]