K.P.Rajeevan v. Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2015/1ST ASHADHA, 1937 RP.No. 535 of 2015 () IN WP(C).14199/2015 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THEJUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14199/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-05-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------- K.P.RAJEEVAN, AGED 54 YEARS S/O.PADMANABHAN, STAR VISION CABLE, EROOR ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S):
------------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695004.
2. CHIEF ENGINEER ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM PIN-682020.
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM PIN-682301.
4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, KSEB, CHOTTANIKKARA PIN-682351.
5. ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION OFFICE, KSEB THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682301.
R BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- R.P.No.535 of 2015 in W.P.(C) No.14199 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2015
O R D E R
The petitioner himself concedes that television cables have been drawn unauthorisedly at least through negligible number of posts. This is precisely why the condition to deposit one-half of the amount demanded was imposed pending consideration of the representation.
2. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review of the judgment as sought has been made out.
The Review Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.