High Court of KeralaRP/588/2015dismissed

C.C James v. C.Cjoy

2015-07-07Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937 RP.No. 588 of 2015 () ----------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(C).NO. 2085/2014 DATED 03-06-2015) ------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS IN OP(C) :

-------------------------------------------------------------

1. C.C.JAMES, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.CHACKO, CHIRACKAL HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE.

2. SALI JAMES, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.C.C.JAMES, CHIRACKAL HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE.

BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN OP(C) :

---------------------------------------------------------- C.C.JOY, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.CHACKO, CHIRACKAL HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE-683 546 BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SAJEEV THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

R.P.NO.588/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/09/2014 IN A.S.51/2012 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR.

ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN I.A.NO.1312/2013 IN O.S.NO.396/2013 ON THE FILED OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR ANNEX A3 COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED THE 1ST DEFENDANT (RESPONDENT HEREIN) IN O.S.483/97 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR ANNEX A4 COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 09/12/2013 IN O.S.396/2013 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

=================== R.P.No.588 of 2015 in O.P.(C)No.2085 of 2014 ===================== Dated this the 7th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners.

2. On hearing the learned counsel for the review petitioners and on perusal of the judgment passed by this Court, this Court does not find any error apparent on the the face of the records. The judgment is not liable to be interfered with. Review Petition fails and is only to be dismissed and I do so.

In the result, this Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA JUDGE DSV/7/7/15