Professor (Dr.)T.K.Narayanan v. Dr. M.Abdul Salam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2015/1ST SRAVANA, 1937 RP.No. 643 of 2015 () IN I.A.NO.5236 OF 2015 IN WP(C).3309/2015 ------------------------------------------ REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
---------------------------------------- 1.PROFESSOR (DR.)T.K.NARAYANAN FORMER REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, TARAYIL HOUSE, VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 317.
2.DR.K.BABU ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, PRAKRITI, GURUVAYOORAPPAN COLLEGE P.O., PIN 673 014.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN SMT.M.H.BINDU RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. DR. M.ABDUL SALAM VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNVIERSITY P.O., PIN 673 635.
2.STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 3.THE HON'BLE CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT KERALA RAJ BHAVAN, KERALA GOVERNORS CAMP, SO POST OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001. 4.THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673 655.
R BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN R BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC,CALICUTY UNIVERSITY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
------------------------------- R.P.NO.643 OF 2015 IN I.A.NO.5236 OF 2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.3309 OF 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2015
O R D E R
This is a petition filed seeking review of the order dated 17.6.2015 in I.A.No.5236/2015 in the writ petition. The review petition is filed on the ground that, while passing the interim order dated 17.6.2015, this Court had erroneously assumed that the interests of the University were not sufficiently safeguarded while permitting the 1st respondent in the review petition to draw his salary as Vice Chancellor of the University. On a perusal of the order that is impugned in the review petition, I am of the view that the said contention was already considered by this Court, and an order was passed duly safeguarding the interests of the University. Resultantly, I see no ground to entertain this review petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp