Rafeeq.N.P v. The Secretary, Ministry Of External Affairs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 RP.No. 708 of 2015 () IN WP(C).7767/2015 ------------------------------------------ (AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7767/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 27-03-2015) REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/WRIT PETITIONER:
---------------------------------------- RAFEEQ.N.P AGED 41 YEARS S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, NELLAYA PUTHAN PEEDIKAKKAL HOUSE THOOTHA P.O., ANAMANGADMALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN: 679 357.
BY ADV. SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------------------
1. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS SOUTH BLOCK, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 110 001.
2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT 673 001.
3. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 001.
BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
.............................................................................. R.P.No. 708 OF 2015 IN W.P.(C)No.7767 OF 2015 ......................................................................... Dated this the 7th October, 2015
O R D E R
This Review Petiiton is filed seeking to correct the inadvertant mistake in showing the date of birth of the petitioner as 12.04.1978 instead of 08.03.1974 in the writ petition, which in turn came to be incorporated in the judgment dated 27.03.2015. It is stated that the actual date of birth is 08.03.1974, as discernible from Ext.P2 extract of Admission Register issued from the concerned School.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the review petitioner as well as the learned Central Government Standing Counsel.
3. After hearing both the sides and after going through the materials on record, this Court finds that the date of birth shown in Ext. P2 extract of Admission Register is 08.03.1974 and as such, no prejudice will be caused if the correction sought for is permitted to be carried out. It is ordered accordingly. The relevant date, as shown in the first paragraph of the judgment in
R.P.No. 708 OF 2015 W.P.(C) 7767 of 2015 stands corrected accordingly. The Review Petition stands disposed of.
Issue corrected copy of the judgment in the writ petition to both the sides. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE lk