The Manager, Hidayathul Muslim Yatheemkhana Higher Secondary School v. Jubair K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 RP.No. 727 of 2015 () IN WP(C).21144/2015 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).21144/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14-7-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/(4TH RESPONDENT):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE MANAGER HIDAYATHUL MUSLIM YATHEEMKHANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MANJERI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676121.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR SRI.HARISH R. MENON RESPONDENT(S)(PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 & 5): ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. JUBAIR K., AGED 46 YEARS S/O MOHAMMEDALI K., HSA (MATHS) HIDAYATHUL MUSLIM YATHEEMKHANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MANJERI RESIDING AT KHAIMA, UGRAPUAM P.O., AREA CODE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673639.
2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
3. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, B2, BLOCK, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM-676505.
5. AYISHA SONI P.K.
HSST (COMPUTER SCIENCE) HIDAYATHUL MUSLIM YATHEEMKHANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MANJERI P.O.
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676122.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE R BY SRI.P.K.MOHAMED JAMEEL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
------------------------------- R.P.NO.727 OF 2015 IN W.P.(C).NO.21144 OF 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2015
O R D E R
The above review petition is filed seeking review of the judgment dated 14.7.2015. By the said judgment, I had disposed the writ petition by directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on two revision petitions that were filed before him, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, after hearing the petitioner, 5th respondent and the 4th respondent Manager of the School. The present review petition is filed by the Manager of the School stating that, on the date of passing the judgment in the writ petition, Ext.P4 revision petition preferred by the petitioner had already been heard. It is not in dispute, however, that no orders were passed by the 1st respondent pursuant to the said hearing and before the impugned judgment. Further, there is no prejudice caused to the review petitioner by the directions in the judgment sought to be reviewed, since the rights of the review petitioner have also been protected in the said judgment. I, therefore,
R.P.No.727/2015 IN W.P.(C).No.21144/2015 see no ground to review the judgment dated 14.7.2015. The review petition fails, and is accordingly dismissed. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp