← Library
High Court of KeralaRP/761/2015allowed

Sunilkumar v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-14Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/23RD BHADRA, 1937 RP.No. 761 of 2015 (I) IN WP(C).3917/2013 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 3917/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 04-08-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------------- SUNILKUMAR.S SOUPARNIKA, HARITHA NAGAR ROAD, THRIKKAKARA COCHIN-22.

BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM-682 030.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KOCHI CITY-682 018.

4. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ERNAKULAM-682 030.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWCY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- R.P. No.761 of 2015-L In WP(C) No.3917 of 2013-L --------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of September, 2015.

O R D E R

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that, the judgment in review took note of only the fact of non-renewal of double barrel gun. In fact the application itself was for renewal of licence of a 12 bore DBBL gun and one 0.32 bore pistol. Both were declined in Ext.P5.

2. In such circumstances, when the first respondent considers the application, definitely the same shall be considered for renewal of both the gun and the pistol as has been laid down in the decisions referred to in the judgment.

3. The petitioner shall now appear before the authority on 29.09.2015 and the matter shall be heard on the same date or any other date notified to the petitioner by the Office of the first

R.P. No.761 of 2015-L In WP(C) No.3917 of 2013-L respondent and the matter shall be finally disposed of, within one month from the date of hearing.

The review petition shall stand allowed in that extent. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp //True Copy// P.A. to Judge.