Sudhakrishna T.K. v. Director General Of Health Services

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 RP.No. 880 of 2015 () IN WA.2133/2015 --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA 2133/2015 DATED 29.9.2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28706/2015 DATED 23.9.2014 REVIEW PETITIONER(S):

---------------------------------------- SUDHA KRISHNA.T.K (MINOR) AGED 17 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND GUARDIAN T.K.SUDHAKARAN S/O. RAMAKRISHNAN T.K., THANNIKUNNATH HOUSE POST NHANGATTIRI, VIA PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 108.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION KERALA STATE, DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ALL INDIA PRE-MEDICAL TEST UNIT, SHIKSHA KENDRA, 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110 092 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

4. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, 5TH FLOOR, KSHB BUILDINGS SHANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

5. THE PRINCIPAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001.

R1 BY SRI.T.V.VINU, CGC R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.I. DAVIS R BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC, CBSE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J -------------------------------------------------------------- R.P. No.880 of 2015 in W.A. No. 2133 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

Shaffique, J Review petition has been filed to review judgment dated 29.9.2015. In the review petition, it is submitted that there is error apparent on the face of record in so far as the first prayer in the writ petition, clause 3 in Exhibit.P5 has not been considered.

In fact, while disposing of the appeal we have clearly indicated that the issues raised in the writ petition is left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings. In fact learned Single Judge has also reserved the said right. In such circumstances we do not think that there is any error apparent on the face of the record to review the judgment. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE sou.8/10/15 // True copy //