← Library
High Court of KeralaRP/899/2015allowed

P.J.Sebastian v. Thilakaraj

2015-11-12Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 RP.No. 899 of 2015 () IN RSA.538/2007 --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RSA 538/2007 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:

-------------------------------------------------------------- P.J.SEBASTIAN, S/O.LATE OUSEPH PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOY THATTIL ITTOOP SRI.A.G.ADITYA SHENOY RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANTS:

--------------------------------------------------

1. THILAKARAJ @ THILAKAN, S/O.BHASKARAN PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA - 688001.

2. PUSHPAKUMAR @ PUSHKARAN S/O.LATE BHASKARAN, PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA - 688001.

3. SANTHOSHKUMAR @ SANTHOSH S/O.LATE BHASKARAN, PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA - 688001.

4. BINDHUMOL, D/O.LATE BHASKARAN, PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA - 688001.

5. SMITHAMOL, D/O.LATE BHASKARAN PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA - 688001.

6. SINDHUMOL, S/O.LATE BHASKARAN VERINGOTTUVELI, KADAKKARAPPALLY, OTTAPUNNA, CHERTHALA - 688001.

BY SRI.P.R.VENKETESH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ds

P.BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 899 of 2015 in R.S.A. No. 538 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of November, 2015

O R D E R

The only objection taken to by the learned counsel for the review petitioner is to the opening sentence in paragraph 25 of the judgment under review.

2.

After having heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent though the observations were consciously made, in the light of the objection taken by the respondent in the R.S.A., this court feels it proper that the first sentence in Paragraph 25 of the judgment under review be expunged. The prayer in this review petition is only to the said limited extent.

This review petition is allowed and the first sentence in paragraph 25 of the judgment under review stands expunged.

Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE ds