V.Manivannan v. Chinathampi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937 RP.No. 908 of 2015 (O) IN OP(C).1703/2014 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(C) 1703/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:-:

----------------------------------------------------------

1. V.MANIVANNAN, AGED 36 YEARS S/O.LATE K.VELLACHAMI KONAR C/O.R.S.RAMASWAMIANS PITCHAIAMMAL RESIDING AT DOOR NO.343, POOJARI COMPOUND NETHAJI CROSS STREET, JAIHINDPURAM, MADURAI TAMILNADU, NOW RESIDING AT SARASWATHI VILASOM, 4/486 UDUMPANCHOLA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.

2. V.MANIKANDAN, AGED 41 YEARS S/O.LATE K.VELLACHAMI KONAR, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.3 A E B COLONY, MUTHURAMALINGAPURAM, MADURAI TAMILNADU, NOW RESIDING AT SARASWATHI VILASOM, 4/486 UDUMPANCHOLA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE SMT.CHITHRA R.SHENOY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-:

---------------------------------------------------

1. CHINNATHAMPI, AGED 61 YEARS S/O.MUTHU, SARASWATHY ESTATE, HOUSE NO.III/20 CHEMMANNAR P.O., PANAKULAM KARA, UDUMBANCHOLA VILLAGE UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK.

2. M.C.AMUTHA, AGED 31 YEARS W/O.S.SEKHAR, RESIDING AT SP 59, 1ST FLOOR STREET NO.3, SECTOR-1, CHENNAI - 78.

3. C.SARASWATHY, AGED 52 YEARS W/O.CHINNATHAMPI, SARASWATHY ESTATE, HOUSE NO.III/20 CHEMMANNAR P.O., PANAKULAM KARA, UDUMBANCHOLA VILLAGE UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH R1 BY ADV. SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.U.VINOD KUMAR R1 BY ADV. SRI.MITHUN BABY JOHN R1 BY ADV. SRI.J.RAMKUMAR GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SAREENA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No.908 of 2015 in O.P.(Civil) No.1703 of 2014 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 26th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Heard learned counsel for the review petitioners. 2.

On going through the judgment passed by this Court, it does not show any error apparent on the face of the record. There is absolutely nothing to be reviewed. This Review Petition is an abuse of the process of this Court and hence, it is dismissed.

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/26/10 // True Copy // PA to Judge