Chavakkad Range Kalluchethu Nadhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Samithi v. V.V.Rajeevan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 RP.No. 926 of 2015 (R) IN WP(C).30393/2006 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30393/2006 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-02-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT:
--------------------------------------------------------- CHAVAKKAD RANGE KALLUCHETHU NADHYA VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAMITHI MUTHUVATOOR, GURUVAYOOR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY CONVENER VIJAYAN AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, CHALIPPATT HOUSE, P.O KANJANI THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONER.RESPONDENTS 1 2, &4: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. V.V.RAJEEVAN, AGED 30 YEARS S/O.VELAPPAN, VALAPPAD HOUSE, KANDANISSERY THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. MADANAN S/O.SREEDHARAN, MACHINGAL HOUSE, AMPILLY KANDASSANKADAVU, THRISSUR.
3. TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY O/O.TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. THE WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR-1 TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, THRISSUR.
5. KRISHNADAS, AGED 32 YEARS S/O.LATE ARAVINDAKSHA MENON, MANNUNGAL HOUSE GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENIL ANTO SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- R.P. No.926 of 2015 In W.P(C). No.30393 of 2006 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of November, 2015.
O R D E R
The matter was posted to spoken to only on the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the writ petition that in fact the review petitioner was heard before the present orders were passed. A perusal of the order passed, now produced across the Bar, indicates that the review petitioner was heard. This Court has also head the learned Standing Counsel for the Board, who has got specific instructions that the review petitioner was heard.
In such circumstance, the review petition would stand dismissed. The order in R.P.926 of 2015 in WP(C) No.30393 of 2006 dated 21.10.2015 shall stand re-called.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.
sp/12/11/15