Sreeja v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/16TH CHAITHRA, 1937 Tr.P(Crl.).No. 69 of 2012 --------------------------- IN CC 167/2012 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, RANNI PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT :
------------------------ SREEJA, D/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, PUTHENVILA VEEDU, DECENT JUNCTION, CHENDAPUR CHERRY, THRIKKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENTS/STATE :
-----------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUNAD POLICE STATION, PERUNAD-689 711.
3. SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. MADHAVAN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PALLIMON NOW RESIDING AT RANI BHAVAN, PERUNAD, RANNY, MAMBARA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-689 711.
4. RAJITHA, D/O. RAMANAN, THUNDUMANNIL VEEDU, PERUNAD, RANNY P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-689 711.
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.P.MAYA THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Tr.P(Crl.).No. 69 of 2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF THE C.M.P NO.4362/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT II, KOLLAM ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFMC, RANNY RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab
P.UBAID, J.
--------------------------------------- Tr.P(Crl) No.69 of 2012 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2015 O R D E R The petitioner herein seeks transfer of a criminal case. But the application for transfer does not contain any definite ground for transfer. Of course, cognizance was taken by the trial court under Sections 420 and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code cannot proceed in view of the statutory bar against cognizance. The accused will have to take necessary steps in this regard. Now there is no representation for the petitioner, who has brought this request for transfer. Even otherwise the petition does not contain any legal or satisfactory reason for transfer. Hence this Transfer Petition is dismissed. P.UBAID JUDGE ab