A.N. Soman v. District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 1193 of 2007 (P) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------- A.N.SOMAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, AMBALATHINKAL HOUSE, KOOMPANPARA KARA VELLATHOOVAL VILLAGE, KOOMPANPARA P.O., ADIMALY. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI.
2. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THODUPUZHA P.O., THODUPUZHA.
3. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KOTTAYAM.
5. EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCE INSPECTOR, IDUKKI.
6. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVIKULAM.
7. VELLATHOOVAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VELLATHOOVAL.
8. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, IDUKKI.
9. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUNNAR.
10. RAJAN, HOUSE NO.352, NEERANANIKKAL HOUSE, KOOMPANPARA P.O, ODAKKACITY ADIMALY.
11. SANTHOSH ABRAHAM, CHERAYIL HOUSE, CHATTUPARA, MACHIPLAVU P.O., ADIMALY.
R7 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.B.MANIMOHAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS,SC,POLL.C.BOAR R1, R3-R6, R8 & R9 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bka/-
WP(C).No. 1193 of 2007 (P) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1 COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.18972/2005.
RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE bka/-
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 1193 of 2007 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Aggrieved by the establishment and operation of a granite quarrying, the petitioner has approached this Court.
2.
This Court, as per interim order dated 30.03.2007, directed that the quarry should not be permitted to operate without consent of the court in view of the statement of the Pollution Control Board. As the very purpose sought to be achieved by the filing of the writ petition has been served, the writ petition is disposed of making the interim order absolute. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/23.11.2015