← Library
High Court of KeralaRP/279/2014allowed

Regional Transport Authority,Malappuram v. Anoopa C

2015-07-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937 RP.No. 279 of 2014 () ----------------------------- WP(C) 3457/2014 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT ---------------- REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN W.P.(C) : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM - 676505.

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM-676505. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C) :

-------------------------------------------------------- ANOOPA C., W/O.PRADEEPAN, GEETHA NIVAS, VENGAD THALASSERY REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY ANTIL K.ANTONY S/O.K.K.ANTONY, KOLENCHERY HOUSE, KANIMANGALAM P.O. THRISSUR, 680027.

BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS ANTONY BY SRI.I.DINESH MENON THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ R.P. No.279 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 3457 of 2014 (F) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2015

O R D E R

The judgment directed consideration of an application for operating the stage carriage bearing No.KL-46 H 1102 as a super fast service. The Government had brought in a restriction insofar as the fast passenger services being confined to K.S.R.T.C. The said matter is said to be pending consideration before the Division Bench.

2.

In such circumstance, the judgment is withdrawn. It is made clear that the petitioner would be entitled to move the appropriate authority if the Division Bench sets aside the restriction.

Review Petition is allowed.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj