Nisha v. K.Ajith
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 RP.No. 1129 of 2015 () IN WP(C).27259/2013 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27259/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 09-09-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/4TH RESPONDENT:
------------------------------------ NISHA R., AGED 39 YEARS, D/O.RAMACHANDRAN, PUNNAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MUNDELA ARUVIKKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW SRI.ASWIN.P.JOHN RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4: ------------------------------------------------
1. K.AJITH S/O.KARUNAKARA PANICKER, AJITH VIHAR, KANIKKAPETTI MUNDELA P.O., ARUVIKKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE ARUVIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, ARUVIKKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 564.
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 005.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 541.
R BY SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN R BY SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
----------------------------------------------- R.P.No.1129 of 2015 in W.P(C).No.27259 of 2013 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd December, 2015
O R D E R
Heard.
2. The review petitioner is the fourth respondent in the writ petition. She had not entered appearance or placed any pleadings on record in the writ petition. She now seeks a review of the judgment raising factual contentions. I find no good ground raised which warrants a review of the judgment.
In the above circumstances, the review petition is dismissed. However, it is clarified that in the event of the writ petitioner being found in possession of puramboke land, she will also be heard before demolition of the compound wall put up by her.
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE vgs2/12