Dhanalakshmi.P. v. Sheenath.A.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 RP.No. 1132 of 2015 IN RCRev..111/2012 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCRev. 111/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 22-01-2015 REVIEW PETITIONERS/ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 2 TO 7:

1. DHANALAKSHMI.P., RAJ NIVAS, THUVAKKOD PO CHEMANCHERI (VIA), KOZHIKODE-673 304.

2. RANJITH .K.B., RAJ NIVAS, THUVAKKOD PO CHEMANCHERI (VIA), KOZHIKODE 673 304.

3. SHAJITH .K.B, RAJ NIVAS, THUVAKKOD PO CHEMANCHERI (VIA), KOZHIKODE 673 304.

4. VRINDHA SREEJITH, SOUBHAGYAM, UNITED RESIDENCE COLONY ST. VINCENT COLONY, KOZHIKODE-673 006.

5. KARTHIKA SREEJITH (MINOR), SOUBHAGYAM, UNITED RESIDENCE COLONY, ST. VINCENT COLONY, KOZHIKOE 673 006. REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, VRINDHA SREEJITH (4TH PETITIONER)

6. NAVNEETH SREEJITH (MINOR), SOUBHAGYAM, UNITED RESIDENCE COLONY ST.VINCENT COLONY, KOZHIKODE 673 006.

REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, VRINDHA SREEJITH (4TH PETITIONER) BY ADVS.SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU RESPONDENTS:

1. SHEENATH.A., W/O SASIKUMAR RAJ 46 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT K.S.RESIDENCY, AZHAKENDRA LANE KALOOR, KOCHI 682 017.

2. ATHIRA S. RAJ, D/O SASIKUMAR RAJ AGED 18 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT K.S.RESIDENCY, AZHAKENDRA LANE, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017

3. RAHUL.S RAJ, S/O SASIKUMAR RAJ 25 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT K.S.RESIDENCY, AZHAKENDRA LANE KALOOR, KOCHI 682 017 R BY SRI.NIRMAL. S THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-11-2015 ALONG WITH R.P.NOS.1133 & 1134/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & ALEXANDER THOMAS, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.1132 of 2015 in R.C.R.No.111 of 2012 R.P.No.1133 of 2015 in R.C.R.No.8 of 2012 & R.P.No.1134 of 2015 in R.C.R.No.9 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of November, 2015

ORDER

Antony Dominic, J.

The only ground raised in these review petitions is that the fixation of fair rent at the rate of 5/- per square feet is exorbitant. In our view, even if this contention is accepted at its face value, that does not make out a case of error apparent on the face of record entitling this court to entertain a review petition.

We do not find any scope for interference. Review petitions are accordingly dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE jes