High Court of KeralaRSA/1359/2013dismissed as not pressed

K.K. Sarojini v. V.K. Rugmangathan

2015-07-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937 RSA.No. 1359 of 2013 () ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS NO.1/2012 of SUB COURT, VADAKARA DATED 24-07-2013 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN FDIA NO.1493/2009 IN OS NO.11/2007 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VATAKARA DATED 24.11.2011 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT IN AS 1/2012-SUB COURT, VATAKARA/FINAL DECREE PETITIONER IN FDIA 1493/2009 IN OS 11/2007-MUNSIFF COURT, VATAKARA PLAINTIFF IN O.S.11/2007 - MUNSIFF COURT, VATAKARA -------------------------------------------- K.K. SAROJINI D/O.KUNHIRAMAN V.K., AGED 64 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, SARASWATHY NIVAS ONCHIYAM AMSOM, KANNOOKKARA DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE.

BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN AS 1/2012 - SUB COURT, VATAKARA/ RESPONDENTS IN FDIA 1493/2009 IN OS 11/2007 -MUNSIFF COURT, VATAKARA DEFENDANTS IN O.S.11/2007 - MUNSIFF COURT, VATAKARA: ----------------------------------------------------

1. V.K. RUGMANGATHAN S/O.V.K.KUNHIRAMAN, AGED 62 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, SARASWATHY NIVAS ONCHIYAM AMSOM, KANNOOKKARA DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673308, KERALA STATE.

2. V.K.JANAKI D/O.V.K.KUNHIRAMAN, AGED 71 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, KARUVAKKANDY HOUSE KUTHUPARAMBA, P.O.KOTTAYAM POYIL, THALASSERY KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670105, KERALA STATE.

3. V.K.SARASWATHY D/O.V.K.KUNHIRAMAN, AGED 65 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, SOUPARNIKA ONCHIYAM AMSOM, KANNOOKKARA DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK PIN-673308, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE. R1 BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

-------------------------------------- R.S.A. No.1359 of 2013 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal is not pressed. Hence the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks