V.B. Sheeba v. Appu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/18TH PHALGUNA, 1936 RP.No. 719 of 2014 (O) IN OP(C).1881/2014 ------------------------------------------- IN OP(C) 1881/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18.08.2014 REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

--------------------------------------------------- V.B. SHEEBA, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O.BABURAJ A.K., RESIDING AT ALIL, PUTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.VENKETESH SRI.JAGADEESH LAKSHMAN SRI.P.C.CHACKO(PARATHANAM) SRI.N.S.DAYA SINDHU SHREE HARI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN OP:

---------------------------------------------------------

1. APPU, ALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK - 680 004.

2. SARASWATHY, W/O. APPU, ALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK - 680 004.

3. RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.CHANGARANGATH SARASWATHY, POOTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK - 680 004.

4. SUPRABHA, W/O. CHANGARATH RAMACHANDRAN, POOTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE & TALUK - 680 004. R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR R3-R4 BY ADV. SRI.C.D.DILEEP BY ADV. SRI.T.B.THANKAPPAN(ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

RP NO. 719/2014 IN OP(C) NO. 1881/2014 APPENDIX ANNEXURE A1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY PETITIONER AGAINST EXHIBIT P1 INTERIM REPORT OF ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN IA NO. 8940/2007 IN OS NO. 2227/2007 DATED 11.12.2012.

ANNEXURE A2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO. 15125 OF 2013 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF IN IA NO. 8940 OF 2007 IN OS NO. 2227 OF 2007 DATED 23.10.2013.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- R.P. NO. 719 OF 2014 IN OP(C) NO. 1881 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of March, 2015

ORDER

The review petition was entertained in a bid to explore the possibility of settlement. But my attempts became futile and the parties are at warring ends even now. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record warranting review. The Review Petition is dismissed making it clear that the report of the Advocate Commissioner in the proceedings for review can be made use of by the parties subject to the objections filed therein in the suits pending. V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd