Vadavukode Puthencruz Grama Panchayath v. T.C. Varghese
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/27TH KARTHIKA, 1937 RP. No. 869 of 2014 (J) IN WP(C).13494/2014 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13494/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 23-07-2014 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1. VADAVUKODE PUTHENCRUZ GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PUTHENCRUZ.P.O., ERNAKULAM PIN-682308.
2. VADAVUKODE PUTHENCRUZ GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VADAVUKODE PUTHENCRUZ GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PUTHENCRUZ.P.O., ERNAKULAM-682308.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
-------------------------------------------------- T.C. VARGHESE THENUM MOOLAYIL, VARIKKOLI.P.O., PUTHENCRUZ ERNAKULAM.
BY SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP. No. 869 of 2014 (J) APPENDIX REVIEW PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:- A:- COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.II(1) DATED 17.1.2014. B:- COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE DATED 27.6.2014. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL KRJ //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.M.Appln. No.347 of 2014 & R.P No.869 of 2014 in W.P(C) No.13494 of 2014 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18th day of November, 2015
ORDER
The review petitioners are the respondents in the writ petition.
2. Though notice has been duly served on the respondents in the writ petition, they did not turn up. Accordingly after hearing the petitioner and perusing the records, the impugned judgment was passed. The review petitioners cannot point out any error apparent on the face of the record to entertain a review petition like this. No sufficient reasons are stated for condoning the delay in filing the review petition also. Therefore, the delay petition is dismissed. Consequently, the review petition is also dismissed. Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj