High Court of KeralaRPFC/429/2015dismissed as withdrawn

Dinakaran v. Jayalakshmi

2015-11-17Honourable Mr. Justice B.Sudheendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 RPFC.No. 429 of 2015 () ------------------------ (AGAINST THE ORDER IN MP 119/2014 IN MC 300/2012 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA) REVISION PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:

------------------------------------------------------------------ DINAKARAN S/O. SARASWATHIAMMA, MUNDANCHERY HOUSE S.N. PURAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, KUDUNGALLORE TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.N.L.BITTO RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS:

----------------------------------------------------

1. JAYALAKSHMI D/O. DEVAKI AMMA, PAITTILALATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE EDATHIRINJI VILLAGHE AND DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR - 680 001.

2. MINOR DIJESH, S/O. DINAKARAN, REPRESENTED BY JAYALAKSHMI D/O. DEVAKI AMMA, PAITTILALATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE EDATHIRINJI VILLAGHE AND DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR - 680 001.

3. MINOR ADARSH, S/O. DINAKARAN, REPRESENTD BY JAYALAKSHMI D/O. DEVAKI AMMA, PAITTILALATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE EDATHIRINJI VILLAGHE AND DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR - 680 001.

R1 -R 3 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - R.P.(F.C.) No.429 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of November 2015

O R D E R

When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has prayed for granting permission to withdraw the revision petition. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this revision petition stands dismissed. I make it clear that the dismissal of the revision petition will not take away the right, if any, of the revision petitioner in seeking for other remedies available to him under law.

Sd/ B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE dl/20.11.2015