Sri.Abdul Raheem v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/20TH MAGHA, 1936 RP.No. 1004 of 2014 () IN OT.Rev.201/2014 ------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.T.REV.NO.201/14 DATED 13/11/14) REVIEW PETITIONER(S):

---------------------------------------- SRI.ABDUL RAHEEM KAIPURATH HOUSE, ERAMANGALAM, BALUSSERY KOZHIKKODE.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.SHAMEEM AHAMED SRI.S.K.SAJU SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA (REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAW)ERNAKULAM) PIN - 682 018.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RENNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMBIL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JJ.

============================== R.P.No.1004 OF 2014 in O.T.Rev.No.201 of 2014 ==================== Dated this the 9th day of February, 2015

O R D E R

Antony Dominic, J.

Even going by the submissions made, the grounds urged now were not urged when the OTR was heard. The fact that the ground now urged was mentioned in the revision petition is of no consequence and unless the ground pleaded was urged before this Court, this Court cannot be expected to consider the same. This, therefore, means that the judgment cannot be faulted for any error apparent on the face of it. 2.

We are not satisfied that grounds of review have been made out.

Review petition is dismissed.

Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE Sd/- ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge