High Court of KeralaRP/1046/2014dismissed

Sathiyamma v. Gayathri

2015-06-16Honourable Mr. Justice P.D.Rajan,Honourable Mr.Justice Antony Dominic2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 RP.No. 1046 of 2014 IN Mat.Appeal.571/2009 ------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Mat.Appeal 571/2009 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15.7.2013 REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN MAT APPEAL:

SATHIYAMMA, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. DAKSHYANI AMMA, MUKESH BHAVANANM MUTHUKULAM VADAKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, HARIPAD ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN SRI.ARUN BOSE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDEDNTS IN MAT APPEAL:

1. GAYATHRI, AGED 42 YEARS W/O. RAJENDRAN, PUTHANPURAYIL, ERICKAVU MURI KUMARAPURAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 548.

2. RENJITH,, AGED 11 YEARS S/O. REJENDRAN, REPRESENTED BY GAYATHRI(MOTHER) PUTHANPURAYIL, ERICKAVU MURI, KUMARUPUARAM ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. PIN-690 548.

3. C.P. RAJENDRAN, , AGED 47 YEARS S/O. RAGHAVAN, KALLIKSSERIL HOUSE, VADAKKUM MURI MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 506. R BY SRI. S.SANAL KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & P.D.RAJAN, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.M.Appln.3907 OF 2014 in R.P.No.1046 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

ORDER

Antony Dominic, J.

C.M.Appln.3907 OF 2014:

This is an application filed to condone the delay of 485 days in filing the review petition. The only reason stated in the affidavit is that despite the advice to file a review, "due to ill health and acute financial stringency I could not pool the requisite amount". There is absolutely nothing to substantiate these vague averments.

In such circumstances, we are unable to accept the above unsubstantiated averments and condone the long and inordinate delay. C.M.Application is rejected.

Review petition will also stand rejected.

Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE Sd/- P.D.RAJAN JUDGE jes