The Commandant v. Raveendranath

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/14TH SRAVANA, 1937 WA.No. 921 of 2012 () IN WP(C).12140/2011 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12140/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 09-11-2011 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5:

------------------------

1. THE COMMANDANT CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE UNIT SATHISH DHAWAN SPACE CENTRE SHAR, SRIHARIKOTTA NELLOOR DISTIRCT, ANDRA PRADESH-524 142.

2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE REGIONAL TRAINING CENTRE, BARWAHA DARIYAMAHAL (POST OFFICE) KHARGONE DISTRICT MADHYA PRADESH-451 115.

BY ADV. SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN,SENIOR PANEL COUNSE RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: ----------------------------

1. RAVEENDRANATH POOKUTH HOUSE, PERIMBADARI, P.O.MANNARKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT NOW WORKING AS HEAD CONSTABLE/DRIVER CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE REGIONAL TRAINING CENTRE, BARWAHA DARIYAMAHAL (POST OFFICE), KHARGONE DISTRICT MADHYA PRADESH-451 115.

2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SCHEDULED CASTE AND SCHEDULED TRIBE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETRIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 023.

3. SCRUTINY COIMMITTEE FOR VERIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CERTIFICATES, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHARIMAN SCHEDULED CASTE AND SCHEDULED TRIBE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETRIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 023.

4. THE VIGILANCE CELL OF KIRTADS, REPRESENTED BY ITS VIGILANCE OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF KIRTADS, KOZHIKODE-670 017.

R1 BY SMT.S.KARTHIKA BY SPL GOVT PLEADER SRI.C.K.JAYAKUMAR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.

----------------------------------- W.A.No.921 of 2012 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

Antony Dominic, J.

This writ appeal is filed by respondents 4 and 5 in W.P(C).12140/11, aggrieved by the judgment of the learned single Judge allowing the writ petition filed by the first respondent herein. This Court has already dismissed W.A.284/12 filed by respondents 2, 3 and 4 herein. In that view of the matter, since the issue is thus covered, this writ appeal cannot be entertained and is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge.

Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, Judge.

kkb.

/True copy/ PS to Judge